Webcourt of appeal decisions in Castillo v. Glenair, Inc. (2024) 23 Cal.App.5th 262 (Castillo) (petition for review denied) and this case, Grande v. Eisenhower Medical Center (2024) 44 Cal.App.5th 1147 (Grande). If the Court agrees that Eisenhower was FlexCare’s agent or representative when WebThe Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the court of appeal affirming the judgment of the trial court against a hospital based on violations of the Labor Code and the Unfair …
ISSUES PENDING BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT …
WebSep 7, 2024 · Case Details Full title:ANNIE LOHMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW et al.… Court:California Court of Appeals, Sixth District Date published: Sep 7, 2024 CitationsCopy Citation No. H046681 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 7, 2024) From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Lohman v. City of Mountain View WebMar 12, 2024 · The trial court held a trial limited to the questions of whether Eisenhower was a released party as a result of the settlement agreement and/or whether Eisenhower and FlexCare were in privity such that Grande’s claims against Eisenhower were barred by the prior action against FlexCare. highbridge pool washington heights
LIM v. MOON No. B314481. By SEGAL 20240812036 Leagle.com
WebThere was a problem while loading. Click here to try reloading the page. If the problem persists please contact technical support for assistance. WebJun 30, 2024 · According to Grande, FlexCare and Eisenhower failed to ensure she received her required meal and rest breaks, wages for certain periods she worked, and overtime wages. Grande filed a class... WebMay 13, 2024 · See the California Supreme Court Opinion . ( Grande v. Eisenhower Medical Center (2024) 13 Cal.5th 313.) “The core of this dispute concerns privity. Judgments bind not only parties, but also ‘those persons “in privity with” parties.’ ( Armstrong v. Armstrong (1976) 15 Cal.3d 942, 951.) highbridge premium cannabis